Should Marijuana Be Legalized - 2214 Words

Doug Greene â€Å"We’ve been doing this for four decades, if we don’t get involved and do the hard work, its not going to go anywhere-Just coming here and listening to me speak and getting high is not going to change anything† (Lewis 1-2). The key phrase â€Å"getting high† clearly refers to the drug: marijuana. This particular drug has caused a war for Americans due to its benefits and side effects; they’re some that want to take the risk and some that don’t for legalization. Either way, the odds aren’t in anyones favor at the moment. Like people, marijuana has a past of its own. Back in 1970, Congress adopted the controlled substances act: this policy puts drugs in certain schedules (categories) based of its abuse and medicinal benefits. At the moment, marijuana falls under schedule 1:were drugs currently have no accepted medical use and have high potentials for abuse. This is significant because Congress and the federal government u se this law to oversee medicinal and recreational marijuana: use, distribution, and growth in the present (White House). Congress isn’t the only one that uses this act, but the DEA (Drug Enforcement Administration) follows this policy also. The DEA sees marijuana as a dangerous substance due to its severe psychological and physical dependence (DEA). This is important because federal law bans the existence of marijuana entirely, yet some states took matters in their own hands like Colorado. In 2000, Colorado has legalized medicinal marijuana use forShow MoreRelatedShould Marijuana Be Legalized?849 Words   |  4 Pageswhether marijuana should be legalized. Around 23 states have legalized marijuana for medical and recreational use. In the state of Illinois, medicinal use of marijuana has been passed on April 17, 2013. Since January 2014, patients are able to obtain marijuana with a doctor s recommendation. The new debate is whether marijuana should be legalized for the general public as a recreational drug. Although some believe that marijuana is harmless, and that it has beneficial medicinal uses, marijuana shouldRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?1715 Words   |  7 PagesMarijuana in Society Cannabis, formally known as marijuana is a drug obtained from the tops, stems and leaves of the hemp plant cannabis. The drug is one of the most commonly used drugs in the world. Only substances like caffeine, nicotine and alcohol are used more (â€Å"Marijuana† 1). In the U. S. where some use it to feel â€Å"high† or get an escape from reality. The drug is referred to in many ways; weed, grass, pot, and or reefer are some common names used to describe the drug (â€Å"Marijuana† 1). Like mostRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?1489 Words   |  6 Pagescannabis plant or marijuana is intended for use of a psychoactive drug or medicine. It is used for recreational or medical uses. In some religions, marijuana is predominantly used for spiritual purposes. Cannabis is indigenous to central and south Asia. Cannabis has been scientifically proven that you can not die from smoking marijuana. Marijuana should be legalized to help people with medical benefits, econo mic benefits, and criminal benefits. In eight states, marijuana was legalized for recreationalRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?1245 Words   |  5 PagesMarijuana is a highly debatable topic that is rapidly gaining attention in society today.   Legalizing marijuana can benefit the economy of this nation through the creation of jobs, increased tax revenue, and a decrease in taxpayer money spent on law enforcement.   Ã‚  Many people would outlaw alcohol, cigarettes, fast food, gambling, and tanning beds because of the harmful effects they have on members of a society, but this is the United States of America; the land of the free and we should give peopleRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?1010 Words   |  5 PagesThe legalization of marijuana became a heated political subject in the last few years. Twenty-one states in America have legalized medical marijuana. Colorado and Washington are the only states where marijuana can be purchased recreationally. Marijuana is the high THC level part of the cannabis plant, which gives users the â€Å"high† feeling. There is ample evidence that supports the argument that marijuana is beneficial. The government should legalize marijuana recreationally for three main reasonsRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?1350 Words   |  6 Pagespolitics in the past decade would have to be the legalization of marijuana. The sale and production of marijuana have been legalized for medicinal uses in over twenty states and has been legalized for recreational uses in seven states. Despite the ongoing support for marijuana, it has yet to be fully legalized in the federal level due to cultural bias against â€Å"pot† smoking and the focus over its negative effects. However, legalizing marijuana has been proven to decrease the rate of incrimination in AmericaRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?1231 Words   |  5 Pagesshows the positive benefits of marijuana, it remains illegal under federal law. In recent years, numerous states have defied federal law and legalized marijuana for both recreational and medicinal use. Arizona has legalized marijuana for medical use, but it still remains illegal to use recreationally. This is absurd, as the evidence gathered over the last few decades strongly supports the notion that it is safer than alcohol, a widely available substance. Marijuana being listed as a Schedule I drugRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized? Essay1457 Words   |  6 PagesSHOULD MARIJUANA BE LEGALIZED? Marijuana is a drug that has sparked much controversy over the past decade as to whether or not it should be legalized. People once thought of marijuana as a bad, mind-altering drug which changes a person’s personality which can lead to crime and violence through selling and buying it. In the past, the majority of citizens believed that marijuana is a harmful drug that should be kept off the market and out of the hands of the public. However, a recent study conductedRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?1596 Words   |  7 Pages But what needs to be known before a user can safely and completely make the decision if trying Marijuana is a good idea? Many do not want the drug to be legalized because they claim that Cannabis is a â€Å"gateway drug†, meaning it will cause people to try harder drugs once their body builds up a resistance to Marijuana, because a stronger drug will be needed to reach a high state. This argument is often falsely related to the medical si de of the debate over legalization. It is claimed that this wouldRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?985 Words   |  4 PagesLegalize Marijuana Despite what people believe about marijuana, it hasn’t once proved to be the cause of any real issue. It makes you wonder what the reason as to why there is a war on drugs. Why is marijuana the main concern? Since the time that alcohol and tobacco became legal, people wonder why marijuana isn’t legal yet. The fact that marijuana is illegal is mainly caused by the amount of money, jobs, and pride invested in the drug war. Once the government starts anything, they stick to it. At

I Have a Dream Analysis - 985 Words

Rhetorical Analysis – I Have a Dream. A speech, that will be remembered by many and be passed down from generation to generation, had shaped the future of America by the time Martin Luther King had stepped off the stage on August 28th, as he called for an end to racism in the United States during the March on Washington in 1963. This was one of, if not, the most powerful speech America has seen to this day. A beautiful way to begin! Good job! Martin Luther King stood on that stage with confidence and determination to make a change in the United States of America and it was shown through this rhetorical masterpiece titled â€Å"I Have a Dream†. The first line of the speech makes the audience aware of not only how serious he is, but also†¦show more content†¦Even though it is not a question, but rather a statement, it also makes you feel like you are guilty, that you are preventing his dreams of coming true and also makes you question how you would feel if you were in that situation with your kids, if the roles were reversed? He is making you want the same thing he wants, equality. Good explanation. Other examples of anaphora in this speech would be: â€Å"One hundred years later, the Negro is still not free. One hundred years later, the Negro†¦Ã¢â‚¬  – (Line 8-13, Page 1) â€Å"Now is the time to make the real promises of democracy. Now is the time to rise from the dark and desolate valley of segregation to the sunlit path of racial justice. Now is the time†¦Ã¢â‚¬  – (Line 30-33, Page 1) Many good things came from this speech and Martin Luther King was a big part in changing the United States of America to what we know it as today. Honesty and bravery won this incredible man the Nobel Peace Prize just a year after he gave this speech in front of 250 000 people that day. His intention was to make a change and inspire others to chase after their dreams; he succeeded at both. Unfortunately, Martin Luther King was assassinated on April 4th, 1968, just five short years after he helped to create better living standards for all Negroes in the United States ofShow MoreRelatedAnalysis Of I Have A Dream 1451 Words   |  6 PagesWhen we hear the word â€Å"leader,† faded newspaper clippings drift into our minds. We visualize Martin Luther King Jr. on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial giving his timeless I have a dream† speech. Thousands of people holding onto every word, and listening, eager for the next one. Abraham Lincoln also comes to mind. His long beard an d top hat are forever reminders of his wisdom and perseverance to save the nation. Or maybe a modern leader comes to mind; Malala Yousafzai. A young girl who has shownRead MoreCritical Analysis of I Have Dream838 Words   |  4 PagesMartin Luther King s I Have a Dream: Critical Thinking Analysis Charles Briscoe PRST 3301 16 October 2012 In Martin Luther King Jr. s seminal 1963 speech I Have a Dream, King uses a number of critical thinking processes in order to present his argument. On the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, at the height of the Civil Rights Movement, King delivered a speech that is remembered now as one of the most significant pieces of oratory in the 20th century. His call was for blacks and whitesRead MoreRhetorical Analysis I Have A Dream767 Words   |  4 PagesShelly Ahmed Deborah Williams Rhetorical Analysis 04 November 2017 â€Å"I Have a Dream† The March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom took place in Washington, D.C. on August 28, 1963. There was about 250,000 people in attendance. It was the largest demonstration ever seen in the nations capital, and the first to have a lot television coverage. Dr.King uses the bible to receive an emotional reaction and connection from the audience as The glory of the Lord shall be revealed and all flesh shall seeRead MoreI Have a Dream: Rhetorical Analysis865 Words   |  4 Pagesâ€Å"I Have a Dream† Rhetorical Analysis Five elements of rhetoric: * Speaker: Martin Luther King Jr., a Baptist minister from Atlanta, Georgia, who was inspired by Christianity and Gandhi. * Audience: Primarily African-Americans were present at the speech, but it was heard by many white Americans across the country. * Subject: A call for an end to racism in the United States. * Context: The speech was given on August 28, 1963, at the Lincoln Memorial, in a time where it was very difficultRead MoreI Have A Dream Rhetorical Analysis1346 Words   |  6 Pagesâ€Å"I Have a Dream† Rhetorical Analysis The speech â€Å"I Have A Dream† was voiced by activist Martin Luther King Junior on the Lincoln Memorial during an era in which blacks suffered prejudice in America, a place in which whites could enjoy the land’s opportunities and freedoms but blacks could not. Martin Luther King’s speech was intended to express his present and future aspirations towards the upheaval concerning the inequality and racial injustice that the nation was experiencing however, lackingRead MoreRhetorical Analysis Of I Have Dream1489 Words   |  6 PagesJim Crow Laws and for equality and justice for everybody. On August 28, 1963 Martin Luther King Jr. presented his iconic well-known speech, â€Å"I Have Dream† in Washington D.C. This speech was addressed over forty years ago and it is still relevant to this day and will live on for generations. His purpose was to command racial justice to African Americans who have experienced maltreatment and to come together to fight for equ ality afforded to all under the Constitution. King used the rhetorical devices:Read MoreAnalysis Of I Have A Dream Speech1152 Words   |  5 PagesThe major argument that is being portrayed in Martin Luther King Jr.’s â€Å"I Have A Dream† speech is all men and women should be treated equally, regardless of their skin color. Dr. King states, â€Å"When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir. This note was a promise that all men, yes, black men as well as white men, would be guaranteed the unalienableRead MoreRhetorical Analysis Of I Have A Dream 1372 Words   |  6 PagesThe combination of a dignified speaker amidst one of the greatest movements in American history culminated in one of the most famous speeches ever given. On August 28, 1963, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. delivered his renowned â€Å"I Have a Dreamà ¢â‚¬  speech on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C. This speech is a prime example of rhetorical approaches and rhetorical devices flowing effortlessly together to create an effective speech that leaves a legacy. The use of rhetorical devices andRead MoreI Have A Dream Speech Analysis1714 Words   |  7 Pagesuses words to provoke, calm, and inspire in his famous I Have a Dream speech. Using these words, he creates a connection with the audience, and he gained their trust. Cesar Chavez also gave a speech that provoked, calmed, and inspired the audience to come together and get rid of pesticides because it is causing many diseases among adults, as well as children. He also mentions King many times to gain the audience’s trust. â€Å"I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out theRead MoreAnalysis Of I Have A Dream Speech758 Words   |  4 Pages delivered his â€Å"I Have a Dream† speech in 1963 to a divided and unjust nation. King’s tactful writing reached the entire nation, and his words resonated with everyone who heard them. His speech addressed the injustices and inequalities blacks face in America. â€Å"I Have a Dream† has gone down in history as one of the best speeches in modern history, received at a time of turmoil and racial tension. Therefore, King’s words have rung in the hearts of innumerable people, and his dreams and aspirations

Leadership Style Approach And Contrasting Theories †Free Samples

Question: Discuss about the Leadership Style And Approach And Contrasting Theories. Answer: Leadership style is determined by the organizational environment and classification in terms of organizational need acclaimed from them. There are several kinds of leaders and all of those leaders have separate kind of characteristics as well to meet at goal, all through all leaders are established for the developmental enhancement of the company as well as they are assigned for the timely intervention of duties to employees (Chemers, 2014). These are the important work for a leader to understand the situation and work in repose to that situation. Several Leadership approaches are followed by the leaders. Those approaches are the motivation and team building initiation that helps to grow the leadership standard and also bring the new innovation in the organization to differentiate them alike from others. Approaches to Trait Approach, Situational Approach, and Functional Approach are the important approach for pursuing leadership thus the implementation of this approach is also important as well as relevant (Van Wart, 2014). Trait approach is the most primitive approach that leaders should have in characteristic. It is an amalgamation of a mental, physical and personal trait that only possessed by the leader, not by the ineffective leaders (Van Wart, 2017). Some of the key features of trait approach in leadership are adjustment, adaptability, creativity, and enthusiasm all these are an important and relevant aspect of leadership that showcase the interpretation skill and assertiveness in work to other employees and they would g et motivated by the leader. New and innovative theories implementation and their situational understanding is the key factor of situational approach (DInnocenzo, Mathieu Kukenberger, 2016). This approach is quite important for the changes scenario in the organization and executes their brain in any situation to overcome the problem. Motivation and commitment are the two subplots that added with that approach and strong and weak leadership differentiation has determined by the implement of approach. The functional approach is the most impactful approach of all as it does not believe in theories rather it wants the level of involvement of leaders in terms of application, management, and innovation. There are certain Leadership theories for different situations and these theories are implemented by leaders to mitigate the adverse situation in a constructive way. There are some lead organizations leaders who have maintained a single theory for a good period of time and they have the responsibility and authority to complete the theory in a suitable way (Jensen et al. 2014). Autocratic Leadership is one of the predominant theories of all time. Leaders who believe in this theory make a decision and without consulting with their subordinates they try to implement that in a quick time. This leadership has few supporters as the autocratic nation only subdue this theory rest of the nation will not accept it anyway (Klenke, 2016). Examples of Albert J Dunlap or Donald Trump are these kinds of leaders who believe in the autocratic theory of leadership. On the other hand, Democratic Leadership involves all their subordinates and communicates with their views and then implements an innovati on in the organization. This is the most appreciable and preferred theory by the leader as well as the employees as they also feel that they are in the part of the discussion and express their thoughts in terms of evaluating the theory (Notgrass, 2014). Jacinda Kate Laurell Ardern is the 40th Prime Minister of New Zealand and she came from the Labour Party. The leader has social democratic and progressive approach. Both these approaches are important for the national welfare and support the safety of Labour management. Ardern has the modern and civilized view over same-sex marriage and supports those events by heart and this shows the assimilation of social ethics for the equity in New Zealand (Esselment, Lees-Marshment Marland, 2014). Ardern has chosen some of the universities for campaigning as the innovative approach to engage the modern student and motivate them for the development of the country is the only motive for this leader. On the other hand, Donald Trump is the 45th president of United States and a different form of leadership has overcome in that situation. Most of the decision was taken by the leader are controversial as the leader has followed by some unconventional business practice (McAdams, 2017). In this leader characteristic, some of the great business decisions are taken and make smarter dealing approach in business as well as the nation. The leader has a good view of a political, psychological and personal aspect of future so those decisions took by Trump are define US future but the way of decision making is a bit controversial for some of the critics. In an organization employee, satisfaction understating is the most important aspect for the leader. In case strategic leadership leaders are implementing a particular strategy with the suggestion of all the senior employees. Most of the leadership normally innovate something and for that reason, accustom process for the employees have to judge them only (DInnocenzo, Mathieu Kukenberger, 2016). Thus in the comparison of both these leaders, Democratic leadership style and applying method of Laurell is important as this leader have qualities like team leadership and transformational leadership process and that evaluate a good number rather than Trump. Leadership models and styles This segment of the essay will cover two factors such as Stakeholder responsibility engagement and Ethics ethical practice. The essay will try to show the chosen leadership factors in the selected leader Christopher Luxon who is the CEO of Air New Zealand (Airnewzealand.co.nz, 2017). Stakeholder responsibility and engagement depends on a trust, which is built on brand value and leadership style (Freeman Moutchnik, 2013). Stakeholders are of varied kinds such as the employees. This is indeed a challenge to retain employees in this globalization dominated the world. Employees have varied options in the same industry. They have a tendency to scuffle between the organizations. This is where leadership plays its role in making such employees realized the importance of being into their selected firm (Carmeli, Gelbard Reiter?Palmon, 2013). This goes very true with the Air New Zealand Company. It is a flag carrier airline of the country. The company is based in Auckland. The merger of Ansett in 2000 did prove wrong for the company. The company has announced a huge loss of around $360 million in the last quarter of September. This was indeed a shocking and an unexpected performance (Airliners.net, 2017). The merger proved wrong for the company. They needed a leadership quality, which could dislodge the created challenges. This was indeed the leadership quality that not only took out the company from such drastic situation but it also helped to attain a big success. 15 years later since the incident happened; the company has now transformed into one of the most successful companies in New Zealand (Stuff, 2017). The question arises that what actually helped the company overcome such a crisis. It was indeed a leadership quality that has remained as per the reputation throughout these years. The recent CEO of the company is no any different. Now, the question arises about what leadership quality has remained in practice in this company. The leadership quality in the chosen leader was confined to two important characteristics such as stakeholder responsibility engagement and Ethics or ethical practice (Lawrence Weber, 2014). The repairing could have never happened had it not been supported by the employees. Employees in this company are engaging and innovating as well. They love innovating with ideas. They do also understand their responsibility, which is very rare with many reputed companies. Christopher Luxon was able to change his philosophy towards more practical terms. Employees were made to feel as if they are an important asset for the company. This was indeed a drastic change in strat egy making that resulted in finding the essential factors needed to dislodge the challenge. Christopher Luxon did encourage its employees by presenting them the example of an ideal leader. This was a kind of leadership that encouraged its employees for their best (Fairhurst Connaughton, 2014). Stakeholders are of varied kinds. Employees are one of the stakeholders. They are an integral part of a firm. An organization needs such employees who are the hard workers. Innovative ideas are expected from such employees (Mok, Shen Yang, 2015). Nevertheless, the Air New Zealand Company was blessed to have such employees who were highly innovative. This is never easy to dislodge a challenge as such it faced in the form of loss in revenues. Christopher Luxon has managed its employees effectively. The leader was able to keep its employees engaged with their responsibilities. The stakeholdermanagement theory dictates the importance of managing the stakeholders. Employees being one of the stakeholders represent themselves as a very vital value to the organizations leaders. Nevertheless, there is a requirement to satisfy them on various factors such as the basic salary packages, additional benefits etc. Christopher Luxon has unarguably maintained the same kind of treatment with its empl oyees (Hrisch, Freeman Schaltegger, 2014). Ethicality is the other factor that prevents a company from criticism. Ethicality is indeed very important as it conveys the reputation that an organization carries. This helps in attracting talented professionals. Nevertheless, Air New Zealand is blessed to have such employees who are both skilled and innovative as well. Luxon has shown an ideal resilient against the challenging situations and emerged out as a winner. Some of the instances can prove this right. There have been instances of controversies related to the outsourcing maintenance and minor policy for seating. However, the company has always roved its resilient against such challenging situations (Scoop.co.nz, 2017). Luxon looks ideal to what the company has attained so far in relation to the ethicalities. However, the leader has never shown any sign of nervousness against such situations. It continued its fighting spirit, which is why the company was able to resurrect from a loss that looked impossible before. From the above example of leadership, this can be concluded that leadership quality is indeed required in the topmanagement team or in the middle management team as well. This is required to run the company under the governing of utmost ethical practices. Moreover, this is also important in getting talented professionals who can use their innovative skills to bring a drastic change like the one that happened with Air New Zealand Company. Change Management Models The two identified leaders are Christopher Luxon and Rob Fyfe. Both the leaders have the leadership quality in them, which has encouraged them to work hard in attaining the success (Airnewzealand.co.nz, 2017). There are different approaches, which could help in bringing a cultural change in the workplace. The organization selected is Air New Zealand. The organization has witnessed two most effective leaders ever since the loss that has happened to the company in the year 2000. They both intended to change the culture at the workplace to bring in the effectiveness, which was missing when the loss has happened to them. There are four approaches using which the required cultural change can be implemented in the workplace. Those four approaches are Structure Process, Incentives, People and Changing enforcing Controls. The selected leaders from the Air New Zealand Company had picked "People" as their approaches towards reshaping the culture at the workplace (Cummings Worley, 2014). They had believed in hiring fresh professionals because they wanted to use innovative strategies, which was not possible with the existing employees. The decision had indeed turned well as they finally had compens ated the loss incurred in 2000. The question arises that what changes had then occurred after they recruited the fresh people. The reason behind selecting the fresh professionals was to get a committed and innovative input from them. Nevertheless, it paid off. The freshly recruited professionals had found the two most effective leaders they had ever worked with. It was a good coordination between the fresh professionals and the two leaders in their own era. This was indeed a union of sheer leadership quality with the innovative engaged employees. Hence, such a consequence was certain to happen (Kim, Kumar Kumar, 2012). Forcefield analysis is really helpful in bringing change in the workplace. This helps in analyzing those factors, which are retarding the change process to happen. This is really important as change process can never be successful without identifying the potential retarding factor in the way of change process (Card, 2013). The analysis has helped in identifying that the Air New Zealand Company had numerous issues when it faced such a huge loss in the year 2000. One of such factors was the shortage of competent employees. This is when the leaders had felt the importance of hiring some fresh professions who are both skilled and innovative as well. The strategy really worked because it was its employees who actually helped in regaining the earned reputation. The change can be brought through successive steps. The first step is to identify and define the change. Then there is a need to align the identified change with the business goals. The afterward step is to determine the consequence s. After finalizing the change process, it is then required to communicate the change process to the internal stakeholders and the shareholders. The change will require effective training as well such as it happened in case of Air New Zealand. After the training is over, implementation will take place. This will be followed by monitoring of the progress, which is important to understand whether any further change is required (Hornstein, 2015). The three leadership styles that match with the change management process of Air New Zealand are the authoritative leadership style, the affiliative leadership style, and the democratic leadership style. Both the CEOs of the company were authoritative when they believed in the freshly hired professionals and teamed with them to bring the much-needed change. They along with the engaged professionals did the thing for the company. They were affiliate when they felt the necessity of hiring fresh professionals to infuse skilled workforce. It actually paid off. The hired professionals were skilled as well as innovative. They kept themselves engaged with the change management goals and objectives. Without their proper cooperation, the result had never happened. Both the CEOs were democratic when they allowed their employees ample in place to accommodate their own strategy making skills. Employees were given enough of freedom to explore their innovativeness. Additionally, the trust that the leaders had shown in their fresh talents has encouraged them to be engaged in the entire change management process. The loss that has happened in the year 2000 could only be compensated when it experienced a cooperating approach of both the CEOs and the freshly recruited professionals (Trivellas Drimoussis, 2013). This can be concluded that change management in an organization needs a cooperative effort of an ideal leadership style and the committed professionals. Both the leaders and the skillful workforce identify the operational related issues and then they move collectively to resolve the issue. The approach that they select needs an utter use of innovative strategies. In this regard, using the approaches specially designed for change management in an organization produces effective results. The fact can well be understood in the business transition of Air New Zealand, which had experienced a huge loss in 2000. After a long time of 15 years, they have been able to regain the lost status. References Airliners.net. (2017).Ansett And Air NZ To Collapse - Why? Full Analysis - Airliners.net. [online] Available at: https://www.airliners.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=105325 [Accessed 12 Nov. 2017]. Airnewzealand.co.nz. (2017).Air New Zealand: Book Flights NZ International Online. [online] Available at: https://www.airnewzealand.co.nz/ [Accessed 12 Nov. 2017]. Card, A. J. (2013). A new tool for hazard analysis and force-field analysis: The Lovebug diagram.Clinical Risk,19(4-5), 87-92. Carmeli, A., Gelbard, R., Reiter?Palmon, R. (2013). Leadership, creative problem?solving capacity, and creative performance: The importance of knowledge sharing.Human Resource Management,52(1), 95-121. Chemers, M. (2014).An integrative theory of leadership. Psychology Press. Cummings, T. G., Worley, C. G. (2014).Organization development and change. Cengage learning. DInnocenzo, L., Mathieu, J. E., Kukenberger, M. R. (2016). A meta-analysis of different forms of shared leadershipteam performance relations.Journal of Management,42(7), 1964-1991. Esselment, A. L., Lees-Marshment, J., Marland, A. (2014). The nature of political advising to prime ministers in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the UK.Commonwealth Comparative Politics,52(3), 358-375. Fairhurst, G. T., Connaughton, S. L. (2014). Leadership: A communicative perspective.Leadership,10(1), 7-35. Freeman, E., Moutchnik, A. (2013). Stakeholder management and CSR: questions and answers.uwf UmweltWirtschaftsForum,21(1-2), 5-9. Hrisch, J., Freeman, R. E., Schaltegger, S. (2014). Applying stakeholder theory in sustainability management: Links, similarities, dissimilarities, and a conceptual framework.Organization Environment,27(4), 328-346. Hornstein, H. A. (2015). The integration of project management and organizational change management is now a necessity.International Journal of Project Management,33(2), 291-298. Jensen, K., Scott, R., Slocombe, L., Boyd, R., Cowey, L. (2014). The management and organisational challenges of more joined-up government: New Zealands Better Public Services reforms. Kim, D. Y., Kumar, V., Kumar, U. (2012). Relationship between quality management practices and innovation.Journal of operations management,30(4), 295-315. Klenke, K. (Ed.). (2016).Qualitative research in the study of leadership. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Lawrence, A. T., Weber, J. (2014).Business and society: Stakeholders, ethics, public policy. Tata McGraw-Hill Education. McAdams, D. P. (2017). The Appeal of the Primal Leader: Human Evolution and Donald J. Trump.Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture,1(2). Mok, K. Y., Shen, G. Q., Yang, J. (2015). Stakeholder management studies in mega construction projects: A review and future directions.International Journal of Project Management,33(2), 446-457. Notgrass, D. (2014). The relationship between followers perceived quality of relationship and preferred leadership style.Leadership Organization Development Journal,35(7), 605-621. Scoop.co.nz. (2017).Air New Zealand Draws Praise On Ethics Issue | Scoop News. [online] Available at: https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO0304/S00130.htm [Accessed 12 Nov. 2017]. Stuff. (2017).Smarts drive Air NZ success. [online] Available at: https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/industries/10519234/Smarts-drive-Air-NZ-success [Accessed 12 Nov. 2017]. Trivellas, P., Drimoussis, C. (2013). Investigating leadership styles, behavioural and managerial competency profiles of successful project managers in Greece.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,73, 692-700. Van Wart, M. (2014).Dynamics of leadership in public service: Theory and practice. Routledge. Van Wart, M. (2017).Leadership in public organizations: An introduction. Taylor Francis.